|
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
ICOM 3
ICOM 2
ICOM 1
|
|
|
GOOD JEG; WINDER JD; SELLERS E; WILLIAMS TG.
1992.
SPECIES AND CLONAL VARIATION IN GROWTH-RESPONSES
TO WATERLOGGING AND SUBMERSION IN THE GENUS SALIX.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH
SECTION B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES.
98():21-48.
Address:
GOOD JEG, UNIV COLL N WALES,INST TERR ECOL,BANGOR
RES UNIT,DEINIOL RD,BANGOR LL57 2UP,GWYNEDD,WALES.
The responses of clones of a range of willow
species to waterlogging and total submersion were
compared in glasshouse experiments using
specially constructed perspex tanks. Up to 13
weeks of waterlogging had little effect on form
and growth rates of above-ground parts of two
clones of Salix caprea L. and one clone of S.
cinerea L. A second clone of S. cinerea responded
differently to the other three clones by
significantly increasing its leaf area and stem
dry weight, suggesting that it is likely to be
more tolerant of waterlogging.
Plant parts below the waterline in the
waterlogging treatment responded very differently
to the same parts on control plants. All
waterlogged plants developed hypertrophied
lenticels within four weeks, followed by
significant increases in stem diameter. In each
clone most of the pre-existing root system died
by the end of the waterlogging treatment. All
clones formed adventitious roots which varied
considerably between the species and to a lesser
extent between clones within each species. In S.
cinerea many short, fine, much-branched roots
grew vertically upwards until they reached the
water surface. In S. cinerea clone 90 they
originated from both the pre-existing woody roots
and from the hypertrophied lenticels on the
submerged portions of the stems. In S. cinerea
clone 12 they developed only from the
hypertrophied lenticels. New roots produced by
waterlogged S. caprea clones were long, sparsely
branched and floated on or near the surface of
the water. As in S. cinerea clone 90 they
originated from both the pre-existing woody roots
and the submerged hypertrophied lenticels.
Whereas roots of the control plants of all clones
were mostly ectomycorrhizal, those of the
waterlogged plants had no mycorrhizae. In a
second waterlogging experiment S. x sericans, S.
viminalis and S. fragilis produced adventitious
roots more like those of S. caprea than S.
cinerea. Plants of all clones removed from the
waterlogging treatment after 16 days and kept
with their soil at field capacity thereafter
produced many new roots from their old root
balls. After 32 days waterlogging no such
recovery occurred.
Total submersion caused much more severe damage
to the aerial parts of all tested species than
waterlogging. After eight days submersion the
shoot tips of S. fragilis were beginning to rot
and by day 25 those of S. x sericans and S.
viminalis were rotting too. Subsequently shoots
developed from axillary buds which remained
unaffected by rot throughout the experiment. In
S. cinerea shoot growth ceased after eight days
and terminal buds were formed which remained
dormant but healthy throughout the experiment.
Submersion caused progressive loss of
pre-existing leaves in all species. Some newly
formed leaves of each species developed epinastic
deformities after > 16 days of submersion. All
species except S. cinerea showed significant
reductions in root dry weight after 32 days of
submersion.
In a second submersion experiment responses of
three clones each of S. purpurea and S. viminalis
were compared. Shoot growth was reduced
significantly in four of the six clones after 14
days. No further reductions occurred in the next
14 days of submersion. Root dry weight also
decreased, but it took 28 days of submersion to
produce the greatest effect. The faster growing
clones of each species were more adversely
affected by submersion in terms of both reduced
shoot growth and root growth than those which
grew more slowly.
Considerable intraspecific variability in
responses to waterlogging and submersion have
been shown in these experiments by clones not
selected for their variation in flooding
tolerance. This suggests that selection and
breeding could lead to the development of
flood-tolerant cultivars of species such as S.
cinerea and S. caprea which are not noted for
their ability to withstand inundation.
|
|
|