|
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
ICOM 3
ICOM 2
ICOM 1
|
|
|
BENNETT AF. 1993. MICROHABITAT USE BY THE LONG-NOSED POTOROO,
POTOROUS-TRIDACTYLUS, AND OTHER SMALL MAMMALS IN
REMNANT FOREST VEGETATION OF SOUTH-WESTERN
VICTORIA .102. GAULTHERIA-SHALLON PURSH.
WILDLIFE RESEARCH. 20(3):267-285.
Address:
UNIV MELBOURNE,DEPT ZOOL,PARKVILLE,VIC
3052,AUSTRALIA
Microhabitat use by the long-nosed potoroo,
Potorous tridactylus, and six other species of
small mammal was studied in remnant forest
vegetation in south-western Victoria, Australia.
Throughout its geographic range, P. tridactylus
is consistently associated with dense vegetation
in the ground and shrub strata. However, at a
local scale, captures of P. tridactylus were not
clearly associated with a particular floristic
group, and were not strongly correlated with any
structural feature of the vegetation. Rather,
individuals utilised a range of sites of
differing floristic composition and vegetation
density. Dense cover provided diurnal shelter and
protection from predators, whereas food resources
were most abundant in adjacent more open areas.
The use of vegetation mosaics or ecotones that
allow the inclusion of contrasting microhabitats
within an individual home range appears to be
characteristic of potoroids in temperate
environments. Such mosaics may result from
topographic or edaphic variation, or from seral
successional stages in vegetation following
disturbance. Of the other small mammals, the bush
rat, Rattus fuscipes, and the brown antechinus,
Antechinus stuartii, favoured floristic groups
that provided dense low cover. Captures of the
swamp rat, Rattus lutreolus, were clumped, and
centred on several sites along the forest edge on
impeded drainage where potential foods were
common. The long-nosed bandicoot, Perameles
nasuta, and the southern brown bandicoot, Isoodon
obesulus, were uncommon and clear microhabitat
preferences were not displayed. The house mouse,
Mus musculus, was of transient occurrence, mostly
during autumn, and no obvious habitat preference
was apparent. The quality and availability of
microhabitats in remnant vegetation, together
with landscape structure, are important in
ensuring the persistence and conservation of
small mammals in fragmented landscapes.
|
|
|