|
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
ICOM 3
ICOM 2
ICOM 1
|
|
|
Richardson DM; Allsopp N; D'Antonio CM; Milton
SJ; Rejmanek M. 2000. Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL
SOCIETY. 75(1):65-93.
Address:
Richardson DM, Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, Inst
Plant Conservat, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South
Africa.
Many introduced plant species rely on mutualisms
in their new habitats to overcome barriers to
establishment and to become naturalized and, in
some cases, invasive. Mutualisms involving
animal-mediated pollination and seed dispersal,
and symbioses between plant roots and microbiota
often facilitate invasions. The spread of many
alien plants, particularly woody ones, depends on
pollinator mutualisms. Most alien plants are well
served by generalist pollinators (insects and
birds), and pollinator limitation does not appear
to be a major barrier for the spread of
introduced plants (special conditions relating to
Ficus and orchids are described). Seeds of many
of the most notorious plant invaders are
dispersed by animals, mainly birds and mammals.
Our review supports the view that tightly
coevolved, plant-vertebrate seed dispersal
systems are extremely rare. Vertebrate-dispersed
plants are generally not limited reproductively
by the lack of dispersers. Most mycorrhizal
plants form associations with arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi which, because of their low
specificity, do not seem to play a major role in
facilitating or hindering plant invasions (except
possibly on remote islands such as the Galapagos
which are poor in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi).
The lack of symbionts has, however, been a major
barrier for many ectomycorrhizal plants, notably
for Pinus spp. in parts of the southern
hemisphere. The roles of nitrogen-fixing
associations between legumes and rhizobia and
between actinorhizal plants and Frankia spp. in
promoting or hindering invasions have been
virtually ignored in the invasions literature.
Symbionts required to induce nitrogen fixation in
many plants are extremely widespread, but
intentional introductions of symbionts have
altered the invasibility of many, if not most,
systems. Some of the world's worst invasive alien
species only invaded after the introduction of
symbionts. Mutualisms in the new environment
sometimes re-unite the same species that form
partnerships in the native range of the plant.
Very often, however, different species are
involved, emphasizing the diffuse nature of many
(most) mutualisms. Mutualisms in new habitats
usually duplicate functions or strategies that
exist in the natural range of the plant.
Occasionally, mutualisms forge totally novel
combinations, with profound implications for the
behaviour of the introduced plant in the new
environment (examples are seed dispersal
mutualisms involving wind-dispersed pines and
cockatoos in Australia; and mycorrhizal
associations involving plant roots and fungi).
Many ecosystems are becoming more susceptible to
invasion by introduced plants because: (a) they
contain an increasing array of potential
mutualistic partners (e.g. generalist frugivores
and pollinators, mycorrhizal fungi with wide host
ranges, rhizobia strains with infectivity across
genera); and (b) conditions conducive for the
establishment of various alien/alien synergisms
are becoming more abundant. Incorporating
perspectives on mutualisms in screening protocols
will improve (but not perfect) our ability to
predict whether a given plant species could
invade a particular habitat.
|
|
|