|
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
ICOM 3
ICOM 2
ICOM 1
|
|
|
Barroetavena, C; Cazares, E; Rajchenberg, M. 2007. Ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir: a comparison of species richness in native western North American forests and Patagonian plantations from Argentina. MYCORRHIZA. 17(5):355-373.
Address:
Barroetavena, C, CIEFAP, Ctr Invest Forestal, CC 14, RA-9200 Esquel,
Chubut, Argentina
The putative ectomycorrhizal fungal species registered from sporocarps
associated with ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir forests in their natural
range distribution (i. e., western Canada, USA, and Mexico) and from
plantations in south Argentina and other parts of the world are listed.
One hundred and fifty seven taxa are reported for native ponderosa pine
forests and 514 taxa for native Douglas-fir forests based on available
literature and databases. A small group of genera comprises a high
proportion of the species richness for native Douglas-fir (i. e.,
Cortinarius, Inocybe, and Russula), whereas in native ponderosa pine,
the species richness is more evenly distributed among several genera.
The comparison between ectomycorrhizal species richness associated with
both trees in native forests and in Patagonia (Argentina) shows far
fewer species in the latter, with 18 taxa for the ponderosa pine and 15
for the Douglas-fir. Epigeous species richness is clearly dominant in
native Douglas-fir, whereas a more balanced relation epigeous/hypogeous
richness is observed for native ponderosa pine; a similar trend was
observed for Patagonian plantations. Most fungi in Patagonian
Douglas-fir plantations have not been recorded in plantations
elsewhere, except Suillus lakei and Thelephora terrestris, and only 56%
of the fungal taxa recorded in Douglas-fir plantations around the world
are known from native forests, the other taxa being new associations
for this host, suggesting that new tree + ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa
associations are favored in artificial situations as plantations.
|
|
|