|
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
ICOM 3
ICOM 2
ICOM 1
|
|
|
De Mita, S; Santoni, S; Ronfort, J; Bataillon, T. 2007. Adaptive evolution of the symbiotic gene NORK is not correlated with shifts of rhizobial specificity in the genus Medicago. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY. 7:210.
Address:
De Mita, S, INRA, UMR 1097 Divers Adaptat Plantes Cultivees,
Montpellier, France
Background: The NODULATION RECEPTOR KINASE (NORK) gene encodes a
Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR)-containing receptor-like protein and controls
the infection by symbiotic rhizobia and endomycorrhizal fungi in
Legumes. The occurrence of numerous amino acid changes driven by
directional selection has been reported in this gene, using a limited
number of messenger RNA sequences, but the functional reason of these
changes remains obscure. The Medicago genus, where changes in rhizobial
associations have been previously examined, is a good model to test
whether the evolution of NORK is influenced by rhizobial interactions.
Results: We sequenced a region of 3610 nucleotides (encoding a 392
amino acid-long region of the NORK protein) in 32 Medicago species. We
confirm that positive selection in NORK has occurred within the
Medicago genus and find that the amino acid positions targeted by
selection occur in sites outside of solvent-exposed regions in LRRs,
and other sites in the N-terminal region of the protein. We tested if
branches of the Medicago phylogeny where changes of rhizobial symbionts
occurred displayed accelerated rates of amino acid substitutions. Only
one branch out of five tested, leading to M. noeana, displays such a
pattern. Among other branches, the most likely for having undergone
positive selection is not associated with documented shift of rhizobial
specificity.
Conclusion: Adaptive changes in the sequence of the NORK receptor have
involved the LRRs, but targeted different sites than in most previous
studies of LRR proteins evolution. The fact that positive selection in
NORK tends not to be associated to changes in rhizobial specificity
indicates that this gene was probably not involved in evolving
rhizobial preferences. Other explanations ( e. g. coevolutionary arms
race) must be tested to explain the adaptive evolution of NORK.
|
|
|